Yuxin Xiao

University of the Arts London

Abstract：

This study examines Caryl Churchill's Far Away (2000) and Arthur Miller's The Crucible (1953) through close reading and comparative analysis. It explores three functions of fear in drama: as a narrative driver, a tool that breaks down social relationships, and a way to connect emotionally with the audience. The research shows that Churchill uses fragmented storytelling and symbolic stage language to create a constant, vague sense of fear, reflecting the breakdown of reason in postmodern society. Miller, on the other hand, uses historical realism and intense dramatic conflict to show how fear can be used as a tool for power and control, criticizing systemic violence. Despite their different methods, both playwrights prove that fear remains a powerful medium for social criticism.

Key Words：

dramatization of fear; Caryl Churchill; Arthur Miller; "Far Away"; "The Crucible"; social criticism